Pally: OK, Ging, go ahead. Remember what we learned.
Ging: Gep, I just want to tell you how much I love you. It's
what you stand for that I can't bear sometimes. I wish
you would give up on your Neo-communism.
Gep: Ging, I love you, too, but sometimes your Nazi views get
in the way of good old boy patronage.
Pally: Gep, Ging, you guys need to lighten up a little. Gep,
when you call Ging a Nazi, it simply hardens the
positions you both adopt, making it more difficult to
compromise.
Gep: I didn't call him a Nazi, I described his views as Nazi.
Ging: You... (inaudible)
Pally: Now, now, and you, Ging, mustn't call Gep a Communist.
Ging: But, what if he is a Neo-communist?
Pally: You don't need to say so. If it's true, others will find
out; if it's not, then you will not have insulted him
unnecessarily. Besides, each time you call him a
Communist, it becomes harder for you to accept any
suggestions from him about the budget.
Ging: But we are in the majority...
Pally: No, no, that's not the way to cooperate. Majorities are
not the issue here. There's good in what Gep says, too.
Gep: So, there. Thweeeeewwwppp.
Pally: Ah-hah, better attitude, Gep.
Gep: Nah, nah-nah, nah, nah.
Ging: See what he does? See? I can't work with him when he's
like that. They crow and fuss over every issue.
Pally: Gep, what do you say to that?
Gep: Pally, if he thinks that a majority means that he can
turn the country into a concentration camp, he is going
to get a fight every inch of the way.
Pally: Ging, forget the rhetoric for a moment, do you hear the
integrity in what Gep says?
Ging: You gotta be kiddin'.
Bud: If I have to put up with one more minute of this...
Alamo: Now there is where you are going wrong Mr. Tenior because
you force each party to take sides who will want to put
up with one more minute and who will not don't you see
that when you do that it makes people more hostile to any
positive idea you might...
Arm: What positive ideas...
Alamo: ...want to communicate to the other side if you can be
less aggressive and more nonviolent and think about the
story of the lotus blossom and the snake that I told you
a few minutes ago and remember how the lotus blossom
overcame the snake in such a beautiful way that is in
complete harmony with the upper world...
Arm: What a bunch of...
Alamo: ...that we must all live in together in peace and holy
liberty and justice for all as long as we don't have to
think about doing anything in particular...
Trott: My deal.
Dam: What's the game?
Trott: Stud.
Dam: Five or seven-card?
Trott: Five.
Trott: Five thou'.
Dam: Call. I'll see one more card.
Trott: Ace. Your bet.
Dam: Ten thou'.
Trott: Raise.
Dam: (inaudible)
Note: Fratricide is a term that was used to describe the phenomenon of incoming nuclear weapons being destroyed by the fireball of other nuclear weapons already detonated at the same target, a notion that suggests a limit to the throwweight that can be applied to a hardened target in a single locale. Fratricide was used to justify the "clustering" strategy for deployment of the MX missile, an elegantly a posteriori argument in support of MAD (mutually assured destruction), the strength of which is unlikely to be appreciated by any survivors.
The purpose for the title to this microzine is not to summon any kind of cold war or nuclear war theme. Rather, Fratricide is a metaphor for (a) the bumbling of bureaucracies at cross purposes, (b) the general superiority of domestic political warfare over actual national interest, and (c) the frequent cutting off of one's nose to spite one's face that is a daily occurrence in the venue of local, U.S., Western, and global politics.
To receive notification for new issues, subscribe to the Atom feed at http://fratricide.blogspot.com/atom.xml